Apparently it was released a week or two ago, but I just came across a new Google Maps feature: walking directions.
It works like Google’s driving directions, except it maps out a more direct route using as many two-lane roads as possible.
Walking on roads isn’t my idea of a good hike, but the mapping feature is an interesting idea. It might have some good cycling applications, too, though I think Bikely.com is better suited for that kind of mapping.
Interestingly, as I investigated more about this feature I came across an article at PopSci.com, which said some people are expressing privacy concerns about it. But reading on, I discovered the writer is somehow mixing the StreetView feature with the walking directions feature.
It seems any new Google Maps add-on causes a slight stir with Internet users who are concerned about privacy. The Street View feature, which lets you see a 360-degree photo of the location you intend to visit and then view a succession of images as you travel the virtual route online, is well within legal limits, says privacy expert Mike Spinney from the Ponemon Institute, a think tank that studies privacy issues.
That confusion aside, I doubt there’s any legal grounds for this. I’m by no means a lawyer, but I know you can’t have the same assumption of privacy on your street curb that you have in your home.
A bigger concern should be a concern for Google’s lack of reasonable expectations for walkers and hikers.
I mapped a walking trip from my hometown to Ann Arbor, Michigan, where my younger son will start college in a couple weeks.
Walking directions to Ann Arbor, MI
543 mi – about 7 days 11 hours
Sure, that comes with a disclaimer.
Walking directions are in beta.
Use caution when walking in unfamiliar areas.
That doesn’t come close to warning you that hiking at this pace will kill you! Do the math. To walk 543 miles in 7 1/2 days you’d average just over 3 miles an hour — without stopping to rest, sleep, or eat.
I guess that qualifies for “unfamiliar areas.”